Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kukuh Noertjojo's avatar

Adam, this to keep! I haven;t followed you yet when you posted this one. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Steve Fifield's avatar

I'm confused, as this doesn't feel quite right 🤔. Experienced in making a fool of myself, but could the rule of 3 example be giving 95% confidence of the *opposite* (yes) of what has been uniformly observed in the sample size n (no), being less than 3/n?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts